Tuesday, October 7, 2025
18.4 C
New York

Starmer Faces Largest Rebellion Over Disability Benefit Cuts

Share

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is confronting what may be the biggest revolt of his time in office as around fifty Labour MPs plan to defy the party whip tonight. At 7 p.m., Parliament will vote on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, a package of welfare reforms that would tighten rules for disabled people and cut support for new claimants. Even after last‑minute concessions designed to stem dissent, the rebellion has held firm, signalling deep unease within Labour over the direction of social policy.

Government Concessions and Ongoing Dispute

In an effort to calm MPs, ministers agreed to shield existing claimants of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) from the tougher eligibility tests. The revised offer will apply the stricter rules only to new claims from November 2026, halving the projected savings from £5 billion to £2.5 billion. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall confirmed that change last week.

- Advertisement -

However, negotiators such as Debbie Abrahams say that the version tabled for debate does not match the terms discussed behind closed doors, fuelling further anger among rebels. Rachael Maskell, who leads the charge against the bill, has gathered 39 named signatures for an amendment to defeat the legislation and insists more MPs will back her once the vote begins.

Impact on Disabled Households

The government’s own impact assessment warns that, even in its watered‑down form, the bill will push 150,000 people into poverty by 2030, down from the 250,000 the original measures would have created. The Trussell Trust, which runs food banks across the UK, has warned that 440,000 people in disabled households could face “severe hardship” if cuts go ahead. Under the bill, the standard health component of Universal Credit for new claimants would drop to £50 per week from April 2026, and PIP eligibility would become more restrictive. Ministers argue these changes will encourage more disabled people into work, but critics say they will punish those already at a severe disadvantage.

Political Stakes for Starmer

For Sir Keir Starmer, the rebellion is more than a policy defeat; it is a test of his grip on the party and the coherence of his agenda. Political analysts view the revolt as a sign that he has struggled to unite his MPs around hard choices in social policy. Professor Rob Ford of the University of Manchester describes it as a “failure of leadership for a prime minister with such a big majority” to face such open defiance. Even though Conservative votes are expected to carry the bill, the spectacle of Labour MPs in open revolt could embolden backbenchers to press for further concessions on unrelated issues, from fuel payments to independent inquiries.

Short Analysis and Personal Insight

In my view, this rebellion highlights a deeper tension in modern politics: the gap between electoral promises and the hard realities of budgetary constraints. Starmer won power by pledging fairness but now risks alienating core supporters by cutting support to those who need it most. Moreover, the episode shows how social media and pressure groups can empower MPs to challenge leadership in real time. Looking ahead, Starmer must decide if he will adjust his course to reflect his party’s grassroots concerns or stick with the reforms and accept the political cost. Either path carries risk, but tonight’s vote will set the tone for his next year in Downing Street.
Sources: BBC

Hamza
Hamza
I am Hamza, writer and editor at Wil News with a strong background in both international and national media. I have contributed over 300 articles to respected outlets such as GEO News and The News International. My expertize lies in investigative reporting and insightful analysis of global and regional issues. Through my writing, I strive to engage readers with compelling stories and thoughtful commentary.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest News

Read More

Accessibility